{"id":10530,"date":"2017-01-23T08:56:00","date_gmt":"2017-01-23T12:56:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.inflation.us\/news\/?p=10530"},"modified":"2026-09-26T07:38:59","modified_gmt":"2026-09-26T11:38:59","slug":"nia-members-already-up-100-percent-youve-seen-nothing-yet","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.inflation.us\/news\/technicals\/nia-members-already-up-100-percent-youve-seen-nothing-yet\/","title":{"rendered":"NIA Members Already Up 100%: You&#8217;ve Seen Nothing Yet"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<div><span style=\"font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;\">On December 12th when NIA announced&nbsp;<strong style=\"font-weight: bold !important;\">Western Potash (TSX: WPX)<\/strong>&nbsp;at $0.135 as its&nbsp;<span style=\"color: rgb(0, 128, 0);\"><strong style=\"font-weight: bold !important;\">#1 stock suggestion for 2017<\/strong><\/span>, NIA said that it saw practically no risk at $0.135 because&nbsp;<strong style=\"font-weight: bold !important;\">WPX<\/strong>&nbsp;was sitting on&nbsp;<span style=\"color: rgb(0, 128, 0);\"><strong style=\"font-weight: bold !important;\">$0.15 per share in cash<\/strong><\/span>&nbsp;with&nbsp;no debt. NIA said&nbsp;that its&nbsp;<span style=\"color: rgb(0, 128, 0);\"><strong style=\"font-weight: bold !important;\">key breakout point<\/strong><\/span>&nbsp;would be&nbsp;<strong style=\"font-weight: bold !important;\">$0.21 per share<\/strong>.&nbsp;<em><strong style=\"font-weight: bold !important;\">NIA predicted that after WPX&nbsp;<span style=\"color: rgb(0, 128, 0);\">surpasses<\/span>&nbsp;$0.21 per share, it would&nbsp;<span style=\"color: rgb(0, 128, 0);\">explode<\/span>&nbsp;to a&nbsp;<span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">very minimum<\/span>&nbsp;of $0.33-$0.34 per share within the following 3 to 5&nbsp;trading days.<\/strong><\/em>&nbsp;In the summer of 2015&nbsp;at the&nbsp;<strong style=\"font-weight: bold !important;\">Potash<\/strong>&nbsp;industry&#39;s&nbsp;<span style=\"color: rgb(255, 0, 0);\"><strong style=\"font-weight: bold !important;\">worst financial point in history<\/strong><\/span>,&nbsp;<strong style=\"font-weight: bold !important;\">WPX<\/strong>&nbsp;<span style=\"color: rgb(0, 128, 0);\"><em><strong style=\"font-weight: bold !important;\">set itself apart<\/strong><\/em><\/span>&nbsp;from all&nbsp;other&nbsp;<strong style=\"font-weight: bold !important;\">Potash exploration companies<\/strong>&nbsp;by&nbsp;<span style=\"color: rgb(0, 128, 0);\"><em><strong style=\"font-weight: bold !important;\">successfully raising<\/strong><\/em><\/span>&nbsp;<strong style=\"font-weight: bold !important;\">$80 million<\/strong>&nbsp;from a&nbsp;<strong style=\"font-weight: bold !important;\"><span style=\"color: rgb(0, 128, 0);\"><em>major<\/em><\/span>&nbsp;Chinese investor<\/strong>&nbsp;at a price of $0.3358 per share &#8211; bringing its&nbsp;<span style=\"color: rgb(0, 128, 0);\"><strong style=\"font-weight: bold !important;\">total money raised<\/strong><\/span>&nbsp;since its 2008 IPO up to&nbsp;<strong style=\"font-weight: bold !important;\">$221 million<\/strong>&nbsp;at an average price of $0.50 per share!<\/span><\/div>\n\n<div>\n<p style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: Georgia,\"><span style=\"font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;\">With&nbsp;<strong style=\"font-weight: bold !important;\">Potash market&nbsp;fundamentals<\/strong>&nbsp;making a&nbsp;<span style=\"color: rgb(0, 128, 0);\"><em><strong style=\"font-weight: bold !important;\">stunning turnaround<\/strong><\/em><\/span>&nbsp;in recent months as&nbsp;<span style=\"color: rgb(0, 128, 0);\"><strong style=\"font-weight: bold !important;\">reflation<\/strong><\/span>&nbsp;begins to shift over to the&nbsp;<strong style=\"font-weight: bold !important;\">fertilizer industry<\/strong>,&nbsp;<strong style=\"font-weight: bold !important;\">WPX<\/strong>&nbsp;could easily&nbsp;<span style=\"color: rgb(0, 128, 0);\"><em><strong style=\"font-weight: bold !important;\">blow past<\/strong><\/em><\/span>&nbsp;$0.3358 per share and return to the $0.50 level in the days\/weeks ahead. NIA has very good reason to&nbsp;believe that&nbsp;<strong style=\"font-weight: bold !important;\"><em><span style=\"color: rgb(0, 128, 0);\">large<\/span>&nbsp;new<\/em>&nbsp;Chinese investors<\/strong>&nbsp;are beginning to&nbsp;<span style=\"color: rgb(0, 128, 0);\"><em><strong style=\"font-weight: bold !important;\">pour money into<\/strong><\/em><\/span>&nbsp;<strong style=\"font-weight: bold !important;\">WPX<\/strong>!<\/span><\/p>\n\n<p style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: Georgia,\"><span style=\"font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;\">On Friday,&nbsp;<strong style=\"font-weight: bold !important;\">WPX<\/strong>&nbsp;<span style=\"color: rgb(0, 128, 0);\"><em><strong style=\"font-weight: bold !important;\">surpassed<\/strong><\/em><\/span>&nbsp;its&nbsp;<span style=\"color: rgb(0, 128, 0);\"><strong style=\"font-weight: bold !important;\">key breakout point<\/strong><\/span>&nbsp;of $0.21 and&nbsp;<span style=\"color: rgb(0, 128, 0);\"><em><strong style=\"font-weight: bold !important;\">exploded<\/strong><\/em><\/span>&nbsp;to a high of $0.29 before&nbsp;<span style=\"color: rgb(0, 128, 0);\"><em><strong style=\"font-weight: bold !important;\">closing up 32%<\/strong><\/em><\/span>&nbsp;to $0.27 per share on&nbsp;<strong style=\"font-weight: bold !important;\">volume of&nbsp;<em><span style=\"color: rgb(0, 128, 0);\">over<\/span><\/em>&nbsp;6 million<\/strong>&nbsp;&#8211; its&nbsp;<strong style=\"font-weight: bold !important;\">second&nbsp;<span style=\"color: rgb(0, 128, 0);\">highest<\/span>&nbsp;volume day in history<\/strong>! For the full week,&nbsp;<strong style=\"font-weight: bold !important;\">WPX<\/strong>&nbsp;<span style=\"color: rgb(0, 128, 0);\"><em><strong style=\"font-weight: bold !important;\">gained 58.8%<\/strong><\/em><\/span>&nbsp;on&nbsp;<strong style=\"font-weight: bold !important;\">volume of 10.45 million<\/strong>&nbsp;&#8211; its&nbsp;<strong style=\"font-weight: bold !important;\"><span style=\"color: rgb(0, 128, 0);\">highest<\/span>&nbsp;weekly volume in six years<\/strong>! Already,&nbsp;<strong style=\"font-weight: bold !important;\">WPX<\/strong>&nbsp;has&nbsp;<span style=\"color: rgb(0, 128, 0);\"><em><strong style=\"font-weight: bold !important;\">gained 100%<\/strong><\/em><\/span>&nbsp;since NIA&#39;s initial announcement last month at&nbsp;$0.135 per share &#8211; and we believe&nbsp;<strong style=\"font-weight: bold !important;\">WPX&#39;s<\/strong>&nbsp;<strong style=\"font-weight: bold !important;\">next&nbsp;<span style=\"color: rgb(0, 128, 0);\">100% increase<\/span><\/strong>&nbsp;from its current price of $0.27 per share&nbsp;<em><strong style=\"font-weight: bold !important;\">could occur&nbsp;<span style=\"color: rgb(0, 128, 0);\">just as rapidly<\/span><\/strong><\/em>&nbsp;as its&nbsp;<strong style=\"font-weight: bold !important;\">first&nbsp;<span style=\"color: rgb(0, 128, 0);\">100% increase<\/span><\/strong>!<\/span><\/p>\n\n<p style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: Georgia,\"><span style=\"font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;\"><em><strong style=\"font-weight: bold !important;\">The last time WPX traded this kind of HUGE volume six years ago, it was during a move from $0.36 per share in May 2010 to&nbsp;a high of $1.80 per share in February 2011 for a&nbsp;<span style=\"color: rgb(0, 128, 0);\">gain of 400%<\/span>&nbsp;in nine months. Previously, WPX traded similar volume in 2009 during a move from $0.16 per share in November&nbsp;2008 to a high of $0.84 per share in June 2009 for a&nbsp;<span style=\"color: rgb(0, 128, 0);\">gain of 425%<\/span>&nbsp;in seven months.&nbsp;By year-end 2017, look for WPX&#39;s&nbsp;<span style=\"color: rgb(0, 128, 0);\">total gain<\/span>&nbsp;from NIA&#39;s December 12th suggestion price of $0.135 per share to&nbsp;<span style=\"color: rgb(0, 128, 0);\">break its previous two record runs<\/span>!<\/strong><\/em><\/span><\/p>\n\n<p style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: Georgia,\"><span style=\"font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;\">Over the last eight years,&nbsp;<strong style=\"font-weight: bold !important;\">WPX&#39;s&nbsp;<em>median<\/em>&nbsp;closing price<\/strong>&nbsp;has been&nbsp;<strong style=\"font-weight: bold !important;\">$0.45 per share<\/strong>, but on a&nbsp;<em><strong style=\"font-weight: bold !important;\">volume weighted basis<\/strong><\/em>&nbsp;<strong style=\"font-weight: bold !important;\">WPX<\/strong>&nbsp;has&nbsp;<strong style=\"font-weight: bold !important;\"><em>averaged<\/em>&nbsp;a price of&nbsp;<span style=\"color: rgb(0, 128, 0);\">$0.77 per share<\/span><\/strong>. Therefore, we are&nbsp;<em><strong style=\"font-weight: bold !important;\">unlikely to see<\/strong><\/em>&nbsp;any kind of major&nbsp;<span style=\"color: rgb(255, 0, 0);\"><strong style=\"font-weight: bold !important;\">resistance<\/strong><\/span>&nbsp;between&nbsp;here and $0.50 per share.<\/span><\/p>\n\n<p style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: Georgia,\"><span style=\"font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;\"><em><strong style=\"font-weight: bold !important;\">Incredibly, WPX&#39;s enterprise value is still&nbsp;<span style=\"color: rgb(0, 128, 0);\">below the enterprise value<\/span>&nbsp;of Encanto Potash (TSXV: EPO), a&nbsp;<span style=\"color: rgb(255, 0, 0);\">poorly funded<\/span>,&nbsp;<span style=\"color: rgb(255, 0, 0);\">deeply in debt<\/span>&nbsp;Potash explorer with a smaller&nbsp;Saskatchewan Potash exploration project located north of Regina.<\/strong><\/em>&nbsp;Since 2008,&nbsp;<strong style=\"font-weight: bold !important;\">WPX<\/strong>&nbsp;has&nbsp;<span style=\"color: rgb(0, 128, 0);\"><em><strong style=\"font-weight: bold !important;\">raised 7 1\/2 times more money<\/strong><\/em><\/span>&nbsp;than&nbsp;<strong style=\"font-weight: bold !important;\">EPO<\/strong>&nbsp;&#8211; establishing&nbsp;<strong style=\"font-weight: bold !important;\">WPX<\/strong>&nbsp;as by far the&nbsp;<strong style=\"font-weight: bold !important;\"><span style=\"color: rgb(0, 128, 0);\"><em>#1 strongest<\/em><\/span>&nbsp;Potash explorer<\/strong>&nbsp;with the&nbsp;<em><strong style=\"font-weight: bold !important;\"><span style=\"color: rgb(0, 128, 0);\">best chance<\/span>&nbsp;of near-term<\/strong><\/em>&nbsp;<strong style=\"font-weight: bold !important;\">Potash&nbsp;<span style=\"color: rgb(0, 128, 0);\">production<\/span><\/strong>!<\/span><\/p>\n\n<p style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: Georgia,\"><span style=\"font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;\"><strong style=\"font-weight: bold !important;\">WPX<\/strong>&nbsp;has 463.3 million shares outstanding for&nbsp;a market cap at $0.27 of $125.09 million and after subtracting its&nbsp;<span style=\"color: rgb(0, 128, 0);\"><strong style=\"font-weight: bold !important;\">$70.86 million in cash<\/strong><\/span>&nbsp;it has an&nbsp;<strong style=\"font-weight: bold !important;\">enterprise value<\/strong>&nbsp;of&nbsp;<span style=\"color: rgb(0, 128, 0);\"><em><strong style=\"font-weight: bold !important;\">only<\/strong><\/em><\/span>&nbsp;<strong style=\"font-weight: bold !important;\">$54.23 million<\/strong>.&nbsp;<strong style=\"font-weight: bold !important;\">EPO<\/strong>&nbsp;has 440.82&nbsp;million shares outstanding for&nbsp;a market cap at $0.13 of $57.31 million and after adding its&nbsp;<span style=\"color: rgb(255, 0, 0);\"><strong style=\"font-weight: bold !important;\">$7.05 million in debt<\/strong><\/span>, then subtracting its $192,000 in cash &#8211; it has an&nbsp;<strong style=\"font-weight: bold !important;\">enterprise value<\/strong>&nbsp;of&nbsp;<strong style=\"font-weight: bold !important;\">$64.16 million<\/strong>.<\/span><\/p>\n\n<p style=\"color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: Georgia,\"><span style=\"font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;\">NIA has created&nbsp;a&nbsp;<strong style=\"font-weight: bold !important;\">ratio of WPX&#39;s share price to EPO&#39;s share price<\/strong>&nbsp;going back to the beginning of 2010. Currently,&nbsp;<strong style=\"font-weight: bold !important;\">WPX<\/strong>&nbsp;is trading for&nbsp;<strong style=\"font-weight: bold !important;\"><span style=\"color: rgb(0, 128, 0);\">2.077X<\/span>&nbsp;the share price of EPO<\/strong>&nbsp;compared to a&nbsp;<em><strong style=\"font-weight: bold !important;\">trailing six year median<\/strong><\/em>&nbsp;of&nbsp;<strong style=\"font-weight: bold !important;\"><span style=\"color: rgb(0, 128, 0);\">3X<\/span>&nbsp;the share price of EPO<\/strong>&nbsp;&#8211; making&nbsp;<strong style=\"font-weight: bold !important;\">WPX<\/strong>&nbsp;<span style=\"color: rgb(0, 128, 0);\"><em><strong style=\"font-weight: bold !important;\">extremely undervalued<\/strong><\/em><\/span>&nbsp;at $0.27 per share&nbsp;and almost a sure thing to&nbsp;<span style=\"color: rgb(0, 128, 0);\"><em><strong style=\"font-weight: bold !important;\">rise significantly higher<\/strong><\/em><\/span>&nbsp;in the weeks ahead!<\/span><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>On December 12th when NIA announced&nbsp;Western Potash (TSX: WPX)&nbsp;at $0.135 as its&nbsp;#1 stock suggestion for 2017, NIA said that it saw practically no risk at $0.135 because&nbsp;WPX&nbsp;was sitting on&nbsp;$0.15 per share in cash&nbsp;with&nbsp;no debt. NIA said&nbsp;that its&nbsp;key breakout point&nbsp;would be&nbsp;$0.21 per share.&nbsp;NIA predicted that after WPX&nbsp;surpasses&nbsp;$0.21 per share, it would&nbsp;explode&nbsp;to a&nbsp;very minimum&nbsp;of $0.33-$0.34 per share [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":10531,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[378,377],"class_list":["post-10530","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-technicals","tag-potash","tag-wpx"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.inflation.us\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10530","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.inflation.us\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.inflation.us\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.inflation.us\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.inflation.us\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10530"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.inflation.us\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10530\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10532,"href":"https:\/\/www.inflation.us\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10530\/revisions\/10532"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.inflation.us\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/10531"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.inflation.us\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10530"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.inflation.us\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10530"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.inflation.us\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10530"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}